Dynamic Tracking

by Gene Wie (psibelius)


Imagine yourself relaxing in your ergonomic computer chair. Your dolby surround stereo begins cranking out another mod. Your empty can of Sprite rests by the monitor. Cubic Player graphics flash on your screen. You close your eyes and chill out to a fairly decent groove...

...suddenly, you lean the other way and regurgitate your lunch, laced with an ample sprinkling of Sprite.

Congratulations. You are the newest victim of a bad transition. That, along with lack of phrasing and lack of dynamic contrast, is a problem that plagues many musicians, old and new alike.

Musical phrasing is a concept that most instrumental musicians have to deal with. After learning the rhythm and the notes, musical passages have to be "phrased" into different sections in order to give the music vitality. Imagine, if you will, a seashore, with the waves surging in and crashing, in a slow, timely, rhythm. The rise and fall of the tide is very much like the rise and fall of a musical passage. It makes otherwise boring sound attractive. Transitions involve movement between two different phrases of music. A transition should be relatively smooth, seamless, and effective. Abrubt transitions, for the most part, should be avoided unless your piece requires them for some reason. They make songs rough and hard to follow. A surprise around every corner becomes irritating. Dynamic contrast means "different volumes in different places." Without dynamic contrast, songs are stale and ineffective in evoking an emotional response.

In this article, I'm going to focus on identifying musical problem spots involving phrasing, transitions, and dynamics, as well as propose several possible solutions. Regardless of the style of music you compose, these three elements are important factors. Being able to use all three effectively can make a significant difference in your abilites to compose entertaining music.

-----

PROBLEM SPOT #1 - The song you've been working on has been happy and upbeat for a few minutes. Now, you aim to bring down the volume and write a rather peaceful section with a stirring melody. Approach one: fade out the main theme, and concurrently fade in the new theme. If the tempo is different (try to make it different, because it lends the new section individuality), try to track the former so it is still played at the same relative tempo, while introducing your new theme. Approach two: End your previous section with a dramatic blast of some thick layered chord, fade out, then bring in the new section. Approach three: continue a segment of your previous theme, like the bass line or a drum beat, and build your new section over it. This kind of transition is really inspiring when done correctly. The blend of both sections will be closer, and will help you avoid the "sounds like two songs in one mod" syndrome. Please avoid simply stoppping the song by creating one ending, and continuing on, unless you're aiming for a symphonic 'movement I,' 'movement II,' 'movement III' style, etc...

PROBLEM SPOT #2 - You've been tracking a beautiful slow chorale section in your epic orchestral piece. It is stunning. Now, you need to return to your opening fanfare and theme. There are a few ways of doing this. The first way is to demonstrate your complete lack of appreciation for the development of the piece and just jump right in to your recapitulation. This kind of abrubt awakening usually sends the wrong impression about your music. "Woah, that came out of nowhere? What was this guy thinking?" Try slowing down your theme, while fading out. Then, implement a quick crescendo and thrust forward into your main theme. For an example of this, listen to "Kingdom Skies" by Jason Chong. Chong, in writing his orchestral piece, uses this technique very well. Another approach to this problem is to gradually speed up the piece near the end of this area, and lead right into the main theme without any pause in action.

PROBLEM SPOT #3 - Cut up your melody lines into phrases. Believe me, I am very guilty of writing extremely long melody lines. These spin on and on forever, never ending, never pausing for breath. Imagine a perfectly still lake, the water perfectly still. There is no movement, no life, no energy. Music cannot be like that! Back to the ocean wave example; there must be rhythm, and there must be emotion. By creating melody lines which possess feeling and "say" something, we draw in our audience. One simple approach to this problem is simply to do a crescendo/descrescendo sequence with each part of the phrase. Rise and fall, rise and fall.

Why are musical concepts such as dynamics, tempo, blend and balance, and the like so important? Because they make music entertaining. If we take a look at the songs which are popular, and regarded as, "good," we can see that these songs possess a fine control of all those musical elements. If dynamics cannot be fixed, there is excellent blend and balance to cover it. If some instruments are too overpowering, dynamic contrast gives life to other instruments (but nothing will save your song from an overdose of bass).

DYNAMIC CONTRAST - As a general observation, those of us tracking music don't always give enough attention to dynamics. Some of us track with the instruments at volume 64 all of the time, and don't bother using the swells in dynamics that give music excitement. Listening to a song which is loud 100% of the time is painful. Listening to a song that is soft 100% of the time is boring. There needs to be a balance between the two. Also, melody lines stick out and make a better impression when their dynamics are varied. A short blast of loudness followed by quick, but soft, movement, is exciting to listen to. Those odd samples which are so popular in techno songs have a bigger impact if their dynamics are interesting.

Dynamic contrast is one of the most useful tools in creating good phrasing. The repeated crescendo -> decrescendo pattern is quite prevalant in classical as well as popular music, an indication of its power. Even straight eighth notes can be interesting. Change their volumes!

Dynamics. Your most powerful weapon in putting life into dead leads and backups. Practice in moderation!

-----

EXAMPLE #1 - Here we go through an example song, utilizing the elements we've discussed so far. We begin with strings, very soft, shifting chords. A steady drum beat with a snare and timpani fade in. In this intro, we set the chord progression for the main theme. Then, a suspended cymbal roll rises in volume and our opening brass fanfare at full volume explodes in a tide of furious sound. The tempo slowly increases, and another cymbal roll leads into a fast, soft, section. Pizzicato strings lead on the off beats. Short burts of brass come in an out on top of a flowing woodwind melody. The percussion, still soft at this point, provides a groove, as well as implementing the "wave" effect whenever the brass emerges. The woodwinds slowly increase volume and then lead into the next section, where the brass takes the woodwind's theme and plays a fortituous variation. The brass is joined by the woodwinds, and the percussion leads both into a rehash of the first theme. We choose a quick and decisive ending this time, so all the instruments hit the last note at full volume, then immediately drop to 10% volume. The volume slowly rises, accompanied by a bass drum roll, and a huge crash of a tamtam (gong) closes the piece. There we have it! One of many orchestral arrangements! We skipped a slow section this time, but that's perfectly fine. It isn't necessary.

EXAMPLE #2 - Let's try this approach with a R&B type song. The background of such a song should provide a constant tempo and a fairly steady recurring chord progression to back up the lead(s). Percussion should be mainly filler, except at transitions and solos. Now, perhaps a synth paino or pad should open. Again, quite slowly, as it helps us get in the "mood." Percussion background should join in, and perhaps a few kicks of the bass here and there to bring in the lead(s). Now take some major creative liberties. Try to get your lead lines to recreate the flow of a human voice (unless you really want to record lyrics and put them in). Between each section, make sure you fade in/fade out with different leads, maybe even have a few duets/trios. Don't make abrubt cuts unless you sandwich a drum fill in between for good measure. Enjoy it! You can end the song any number of ways. A drum solo would be nice, but if you don't want to work that hard, the traditional "continued fade out" ending (with the song endlessly repeating and getting softer) will work.

-----

I hope that this article has outlined a few basics in tracking musical phrases for you. Most of these concepts are relatively simple, and a number of you probably won't need the help, but take it in anyway. I still hear songs now and then that lack dynamic elements that could really change the tone of the piece entirely. Feel free to experiment. Innovation in music is respected and highly regarded, if the results are impressive.

All comments and/or suggestions are welcome. If this editorial has helped you any, please write!

Gene Wie (psibelius)
gwie@owl.csusm.edu

-----
                      "The heights by great men reached and kept
                       Were not attained by suddent flight,
                       But they, while their companions slept,
                       Were toiling upward in the night."

                                        -Henry Wadsworth Longfellow

[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]--[II]